Al – Jazeera has the reactions of world leaders to the election of president-elect Barack Obama. Check it out, many nations are holding Obama to his word and expecting changes in American relations with the rest of the world:

Mahmoud Abbas:

“President Abbas congratulates US president-elect Barack Obama in his name and in the name of the Palestinian people and hopes he will speed up efforts to achieve peace, particularly since a resolution of the Palestinian problem and the Israeli-Arab conflict is key to world peace,” Nabil Abu Rudeina, Abbas’s spokesman, said.

“President Abbas hopes the new administration will continue to make the peace efforts one of its top priorities.”

Hamas:

“He must learn from the mistakes of the previous administrations, including that of Bush which has destroyed Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and Palestine,” said Fawzi Barhum, a Hamas spokesman.

“He must improve US ties with the rest of the world rather than wave the big American stick.

“We want him to support the Palestinian cause or at least not to be biased towards the Israeli occupation. We have no problem establishing normal relations with the United States to explain our just cause.”

Iran:

Iran’s official news agency quoted a leading politician as saying that Obama’s election win was a rejection of the policies of George Bush, the current US president.

“Obama’s victory is… evidence that Bush’s policies have failed,” Gholam Ali Haddad Adel said, according to IRNA.

“Americans have no option but to change their policies to save themselves from the quagmire Bush has created for them.”

The government daily newspaper Iran said in an editorial on Wednesday that McCain’s failure to take the presidency lay with Bush.

“Defeat for the Republicans is the price they pay for Bush’s strategic and tactical blunders,” the newspaper said.

Mohammad Hasan Aboutorabi-Fard, Iran’s deputy parliament speaker, called on Obama to make good on his promises to bring change.

“Obama is expected to learn from Bush’s failed policies and correct America’s wrong policies in the Middle East,” IRNA quoted him as saying.

Nicolas Sarkozy:

“Your brilliant victory rewards a tireless commitment to serve the American people. It also crowns an exceptional campaign whose inspiration and exaltation have proved to the entire world the vitality of American democracy. By choosing you, the American people have chosen change, openness and optimism”

The Sudan:

“The result of the election is a purely domestic affair, but certainly the United States, being the only big power in the world, it affects almost everything in other countries,” said Ali al-Sadiq, a spokesman for Sudan’s foreign ministry.

“We would hope that the slogan of president Obama – ‘change’ – would be reflected in the foreign policy in the United States, especially towards Sudan and oppressed countries, the Palestinians, the Iraqis and the Somalis.

“We would like to see some real change between Sudan and the United States.”

Somalia:

“I am congratulating Barack Obama for his election as the president of United States of America,” Yusuf said in a statement released by his spokesman.

“I am hopeful that he will help end major crises in the world, particulary the endless conflict in my country Somalia. This was an historic election in which a proper leader was elected. This is a great moment for America and Africa.”

Australia:

“Twenty-five years ago Martin Luther King [the US civil right activist] had a dream of an America where men and women would be judged not on the colour of their skin but on the content of their character,” Rudd told said.

“Today what America has done is turn that dream into a reality. A world which is in many respects fearful for its future.”

Read the comments in full at Al Jazeera.

Maz Jobrani

San Francisco Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi

Ostad Zolfoonon (In Persian)

Omid Kordestani of Google (in Persian)

To: Mr. Bill Keller
Executive Editor
New York Times

Dear Editor,

I write to you out of a deep sense of alarm about the declining state of our political dialogue and to remind you of the pivotal role that you, the media, can play in our democracy.

There are a variety of substantial candidates running for president this year, including two former members of Congress Cynthia McKinley and Bob Barr and consumer advocate Ralph Nader, yet their voices on vital issues of public interest have been silenced.  How? They are being excluded from the presidential debates. Only two candidates—the Democratic and Republican nominees—have been invited to participate in the televised debates, which will reach 60 million or more Americans.

Recent polls show that many of the third-party and independent candidates have significant voter support, reflecting millions of citizens who are eager for choices beyond the two major party candidates. Too many Americans don’t know about these other candidates or wonder why they are rarely mentioned by the media. Moreover, most Americans don’t know the source of this discrimination: the debates’ sponsor, the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), a corporation created by the two major parties themselves.

Despite the CPD’s claim that its purpose is to “provide the best possible information to viewers and listeners,” its real purpose is to prevent other legitimate candidates from participating in the debates and presenting their case to the American people.

Walter Cronkite called the CPD debates an “unconscionable fraud.” New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg calls them a “mockery.” The League of Women Voters called them “campaign-trail charades devoid of substance…” A genuinely nonpartisan, civic organization, the League previously sponsored the debates, but in 1988 quit in disgust, saying: “The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public.”

It is time for the media to report on this charade and call for authentic open debates that includes all legitimate candidates.

In a 2004 Zogby poll, 57 percent of Americans said that third parties should be included in the debates.

The Nader/Gonzalez campaign is on the ballot in 45 states, is polling at 6 percent nationally and at 6 to 8 percent in various states.

We are in an era of unprecedented national distress. An economic meltdown, massive home foreclosures, two wars, the loss of health care for millions of Americans, a deteriorating infrastructure, the crumbling of America’s standing in the world—these are all issues of profound concern to American voters. Why are only two candidates allowed to talk about them? Why are the candidates from the two parties that have governed us into this mess the only ones whose solutions we are allowed to hear?

The major parties make lots of arguments to justify excluding third-party and independent candidates. One of the most ridiculous is that more candidates crowd the field and confuse voters. This is an insult to the intelligence of American voters, and it stifles democracy. Few mentioned this during the primaries when 8 to 10 people shared the debate stage. The American people don’t need the CPD to decide for them who and what they will hear.

I urge you to challenge the CPD’s undemocratic debates.

I invite you to ask candidates Obama and McCain why they refused to participate in two exciting alternative debates, one organized by Google/YouTube and the City of New Orleans for Sept. 18, and another by the Military Spouses for Change for August 11, 2008  in Ft. Hood, Texas.

I encourage you to ask the League of Women Voters if it is reconsidering its decision, made exactly 20 years ago this Oct. 3, and will once again sponsor open, nonpartisan debates.

Sincerely,

Hooman Hedayati

Cardozo, here you are from the free flying Amazon jungle to a cage in Utah–albeit an open door cage with a fine master. Do not feel sad, Cardozo. Millions of voters have also been put into an invisible cage. It is a corporate-dominated two-party cage with no open door unless they break out and vote for Nader/Gonzalez. They stand specific and tall for justice, peace and freedom within a competitive democracy.

Filmed in Salt Lake City, UT, by Doug Monroe and Rhea Gavry